Make On Trial

Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator?

HubSpot’s groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.

Inside you'll discover:

Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.

Get Your Guide

Friday is tool review day, and the deal is the same one I make with you every week. I tell you the truth about a tool, including the parts the sales page leaves out. No tool is magic. Most are mediocre. A few are quietly excellent and earn a permanent spot in how you work. My job is to tell you which kind you are looking at before you spend your money and your patience.

This week the tool on trial is Make, the automation platform I have pointed you toward all week while building follow up sequences and content engines. It is only fair I put it under the lights and tell you exactly what it does well, where it will frustrate you, and whether it deserves to be the connective tissue of your business. I have run it for years across my own operation and dozens of client builds, so this is not a first impression. It is a verdict. Let us run the trial.

Strip away the category language and here is the plain version. Make is a tool that connects the apps you already use and moves information between them automatically, based on rules you set. A new form submission creates a contact in your CRM, sends you a text, and adds a task to your list. A new sale triggers a welcome email and updates a spreadsheet. A scheduled time arrives and a report gets built and dropped in your inbox. You define the logic once by dragging boxes onto a canvas and drawing lines between them, and the platform runs that logic forever without you.

The promise is that you can wire your whole business together without hiring a developer, and for a remarkable range of tasks, that promise holds. The thing that sets it apart from the simpler automation tools is the canvas itself. Instead of rigid "when this, then that" rules, you get a visual map where data flows through steps you can branch, filter, transform, and loop. It is closer to building a little machine than filling in a form, and that extra power is the whole reason to choose it.

The visual builder is the star, and once it clicks for you, it is genuinely hard to go back. Seeing your automation laid out as a flow you can follow with your eye makes complex logic understandable in a way that lists of rules never do. When something breaks, you can look at the map, see exactly which step failed, open it, and read the actual data that passed through. That visibility turns debugging from a mystery into a five minute fix, and for a non technical owner that is the difference between a tool you trust and a tool you abandon.

The breadth of connections is the second strength. It talks to an enormous library of apps, the common ones you would expect and a long tail of niche ones you would not, and for anything without a ready made connection it can speak directly to a service over a standard web request. In practice this means you very rarely hit a wall of "sorry, we do not support that." If an app exists, you can almost always get Make to talk to it.

The third strength is how it handles the messy middle of automation, the part where data needs reshaping between one app and the next. It has real tools for splitting, combining, formatting, and filtering data as it flows, so you are not stuck when one app speaks a slightly different language than the next. This is where the simpler tools fall down and Make keeps going, and it is why serious builds tend to migrate here eventually.

And it pairs beautifully with AI. You can drop an AI step into the middle of any flow, hand it data, and use the result downstream. That is how the human sounding follow up messages from Tuesday get written, and how a workspace like Galaxy.ai or a meeting tool like Fathom becomes one node in a larger machine rather than an island. The automation is the glue. The AI is the intelligence. Make lets them work as one.

Now the honest part, because no tool gets a free pass here. The first cost is the learning curve. The same power that makes Make great also makes it intimidating on day one. The canvas, the data structures, the way information passes between steps, none of it is obvious until it suddenly is, and getting to that moment takes a few hours of fumbling. The simpler tools win the first ten minutes. Make wins the first month. If you need a single automation working in the next five minutes and never want to think about it again, this is more tool than you need.

The second issue is that the visual builder, for all its clarity, can get unwieldy on very large flows. A simple automation is a joy to read. A monster with forty steps and a dozen branches becomes a sprawling diagram you have to scroll around, and organizing it well takes discipline the tool does not enforce. This is a manageable problem, but it is real, and it bites people who build big without structure.

The third is the pricing model, which is based on operations, meaning roughly each action each step takes each time a flow runs. For most small businesses this lands cheap, often genuinely cheap for what you get. But a poorly built flow that fires thousands of times can burn through your allowance faster than you expect, and you will not notice until you do. The fix is to build thoughtfully, but it is a place where carelessness costs money, and you deserve to know that before you start.

Make is for the owner who has outgrown the simplest automation tools and has more than one or two things to connect. If you find yourself copying data between apps by hand on a regular basis, if you have a real pipeline with several steps, if you want AI woven into your operations rather than sitting in a separate window, this is your platform. The investment of a few hours up front pays back for years, because once your business runs on a set of well built flows, the flows keep running while you do something more valuable than copying and pasting.

It is also for the owner who wants to grow into capability rather than constantly switch tools. You can start with one simple automation this week and build toward a connected operation over months, all on the same platform, without ever hitting a ceiling that forces a painful migration. That headroom is worth a lot, because outgrowing your tools is its own hidden tax.

If you have exactly one simple automation in mind and no appetite for a learning curve, Make is overkill, and one of the lighter "this triggers that" tools will serve you better with less friction. There is no shame in using the simpler tool for the simpler job. Power you do not need is just complexity you have to manage.

And if you are not willing to spend the first few hours learning how it thinks, you will bounce off it, conclude it is too complicated, and miss what makes it great. This is not a tool that rewards a thirty second glance. It rewards the owner who sits down once, builds something real, and lets the understanding click. If that is not you this month, wait until it is. A great tool used impatiently still fails.

If you want my actual library of Make builds, the follow up machine, the content scheduler, the lead router, exported so you can import them and adapt them instead of building from a blank canvas, that whole pack is inside the AI Workflow Blueprint at forty seven dollars. Reply BLUEPRINT and you skip the hardest part, the staring at an empty canvas wondering where to start.

If you do decide to give Make its first afternoon, do not start with something ambitious. Start with the build that teaches you the platform while solving a real problem, because nothing makes the canvas click like watching it do something useful with your own data. The one I put almost everyone on first is a simple lead catcher, and it takes maybe thirty minutes once you stop fighting it.

Here is the shape of it. The flow starts with a trigger, your contact form or your lead form, the place where a new prospect first raises a hand. When someone fills it out, Make catches that the moment it happens. Step two, it takes their details and creates a contact in your CRM or drops a row in your tracking sheet, so nothing lives only in an email you will forget to act on. Step three, it sends you a notification, a text or a chat message, so you know a live lead just landed while they are still warm. Step four, optional but worth it, it fires off an instant acknowledgment to the prospect so they hear from you in seconds instead of hours.

That is four steps. A trigger, a record, an alert, a reply. It is not impressive to look at. It is the single highest return automation a small business can build, because the data on lead response time is brutal and consistent. The business that answers first usually wins, and most owners answer late because they are busy living their actual day. This little flow makes you the fast one without you lifting a finger, and it never gets tired, never takes a lunch, never misses one because the form came in at nine on a Friday night.

The reason I start people here is not the result, as good as it is. It is that this one build forces you to touch every concept that matters. You learn triggers, you learn how data passes from one step to the next, you learn how to map fields between two different apps, you learn how to test a flow and read what came through. Master this one and you have the vocabulary for everything else. The follow up sequence from Tuesday, the content scheduler, the report builder, they are all just longer versions of the same four moves you learned here. Build the small thing first. The big things stop looking hard once you have.

Make earns a permanent spot in the stack. It is not the tool you reach for to solve one tiny problem in a hurry, and it will make you work for the first few hours. But for the owner who is serious about wiring their business together, about getting AI out of a separate window and into the actual flow of work, about building a set of machines that run without them, there is nothing in its class that combines this much power with this much visibility at this price.

I score it a strong recommend, with one condition. Commit to the learning curve. Give it the first afternoon it asks for. Build one real flow, watch it run, feel the click happen. After that, you will stop thinking of it as software you use and start thinking of it as infrastructure your business runs on, which is exactly what the best tools become. Earn the first afternoon and it pays you back for years.

That is the trial. Tomorrow we zoom out for the weekly roundup, and Sunday we step back and decide what all of this is actually for.

If you want me to build your first three flows with you, on your actual apps, so you clear the learning curve in an afternoon instead of a month, that is the AI Business Accelerator at ninety seven dollars. Reply ACCELERATOR and we will get your business running on rails.

Jordan

The AI Newsroom | Jordan Hale | ainewsroomdaily.com

Speak your prompts into ChatGPT or Claude and get detailed, paste-ready input that actually gives you useful output. Wispr Flow captures what you'd cut when typing. Free on Mac, Windows, and iPhone.

Try Wispr Flow free